Be a Voice!

I want to join others who have a love and passion not only for the tiny babies that are not given a chance at life and do not have a voice of their own, but also for the women who are alone, scared, confused, hurt and find no help, support or love from doctors, abortionists and Planned Parenthood where they pressure them to abort without talking about risks and life-long consequences.

Wednesday 4 April 2012

This is why we need to give them a voice! - Outrage in China - UPDATE ADDED

Photo of baby aborted in China at 9 months in forced abortion circulates on Internet, sparks outrage

LINYI CITY, Shandong Province, China, April 3, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A chilling photograph circulating in China shows the body of a 9-months-gestation baby submerged in a bucket of water, apparently a victim of the country’s one-child policy.
Digital Journal reports that the photograph, in which the head and arm of a child can be seen underwater in a large red bucket on the floor, was posted to the Chinese web services company Baidu before it was circulated on Weibo, the country’s version of Twitter, last week.
The abortion appears to have taken place on March 26 after Chinese family planning police in the town of Moshan hunted down the family because the couple already had one child.
According to English reports regarding the original post, the pregnant mother was forcibly held down as she was given an injection to induce labor, after which the baby “even gave a cry when it came out,” but was left in a bucket to drown.
In response to the photo, Reggie Littlejohn of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, which opposes China’s one-child policy, confirmed that late-term abortions and infanticide are common means of enforcing China’s one-child population rule.
“These violent procedures can happen up to the ninth month of pregnancy,” Littlejohn told LifeSiteNews.com. “Sometimes the women themselves die along with their full term babies. Forced abortion is China’s war against women.  It is official government rape.”
“Late term babies are injected with poison in their skulls or drowned in buckets,” she continued. “If the Chinese Communist Party wants to be a respected member of the international community, it must stop forced abortion and infanticide.”
The image and story has reportedly drawn intense outrage across China through Weibo, which has some 260 million users, since the photo began circulating on Thursday.
One commentator cited by Beijing Shots and hailing from Linyi City claimed to have witnessed such measures carried out against unborn children himself, and confirmed that Chinese officials “pounce on mothers-to-be like vampires who see blood.”
“In the hospital, a pregnant woman was dragged by several ruggedly muscular men into the operation room and did not relax their vigilance until she was injected with the drug. They said, ‘Another one accomplished.’ But that pregnant woman was near term! And her family did not even know she was kidnapped here. I later learned that she was captured when she was at a fair,” wrote the commentator.
Littlejohn pointed out that the abortion allegedly took place in Linyi, the same city where forced-abortion opponent and human rights activist Chen Guangcheng still languishes under house arrest.
“This recent incident demonstrates that conditions in Linyi have not improved,” she said.
Although China “has tried to convince the world that it has softened the one-child policy,” said Littlejohn, “this incident demonstrates that this is pure propaganda.”
“This is the greatest violation of women’s rights in the world and it must be stopped.”
 ____________________________________________________________________________________

    This photo and article has sparked an outrage across the world, so we now see why these gruesome pictures of abortion is sometimes necessary to get the point across. I think we (especially in North America) live in a little bit of a "bubble" sometimes, if we don't see it, hear it, don't have to think about it, we avoid the awful truth and we don't do anything about it. THIS makes us SEE the horror and the truth of what is happening to women every day in China. And here's an even scarier thought.... it could happen here.


Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com

President Obama’s top science and technology adviser John P. Holdren co-authored a 1977 book in which he advocated the formation of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children.


SEE FULL ARTICLE HERE

And this "top adviser" is still at President Obama's side today, still holding to his beliefs about population control. "Holdren served as one of President Bill Clinton's science advisors (PCAST) from 1994 to 2001.[1] Eight years later, President Barack Obama nominated Holdren for his current position as science advisor and Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy in December 2008".
 - HOW SCARY IS THAT?

We need to give a voice to these babies AND women all over the world, to email President Obama

 LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA

To email Stephen Harper who stands up for Christian beliefs every day yet does not seem to want to stand up for these babies!


LETTER TO STEPHEN HARPER

This is MY letter to Stephen Harper:
 Dear Stephen Harper,
   Although I am writing to you because of the latest news in China concerning the one-child policy epidemic and the forced abortions that are occurring there, I am writing because this type of "leadership" could happen in North America if we don`t start updating our barbaric laws concerning life and abortion.
   As a Christian Conservative leader we had high hopes that you would see that the laws (or "lack of laws") concerning Abortion is one of the worst in Canada, and this is not right! Not only are babies being murdered on a regular basis (if you don`t want to consider first or even second trimester babies in the womb "humans", science and technology all recognize that at the very least THIRD trimester babies ARE babies), but the women that are going for these abortions are suffering afterwards, these are your Canadians.
   These women have higher suicide rates, much higher abuse of alcohol and drugs afterwards, very high depression rates, they become high-risk in general as they begin to lose hope and care for life, and these women did NOT receive the proper warnings, risks and consequences of what this abortion will do to them when they went to a doctor, abortionist or Planned Parenthood.
   To say "I will just NOT re-open this debate" is silly to be honest, it is irresponsible as a leader to shut the book on a debate that has not been changed or UPDATED for many years, every other human rights law HAS changed or at least been re-opened to discuss and let the public be heard, and this one needs to be as well.
   The horrible one-child policy that is occurring in China right now should open OUR eyes that without laws PROTECTING our children AND women that we fall apart as a country and a society. PLEASE re-consider.
Thank you,
  Jennie 
_________________________________________________________________________________

UPDATE:  There are two Obama czars who seem to have ideas in conformity with Singer – Cass Sunstein, Obama Regulatory Czar and John Holdren, Obama Science Czar. 

PETER SINGER - He is a Princeton professor of bioethics and he wrote an article at NYT.com/magazine about rationing of health care and how it must be done.  This is not some old writing either but dated July 15, 2009.  Peter Singer is a real piece of work and caused some controversy when he was first hired at Princeton (I believe 1999) and no wonder.
He has come up with these equations  such as “one teenager is worth (blank) 85 year olds.”  I guess maybe he has not come up with the number of old people worth the one teenager.  I suppose this will be up to the government committee or maybe the health czar.  I find this shocking.
The following are Peter Singer quotes.  This comes from an older source:
“I do think that it is sometimes appropriate to kill a human infant. For me, the relevant question is, what makes it so seriously wrong to take a life?  Those of you who are not vegetarians are responsible for taking a life every time you eat. Species is no more relevant than race in making these judgments.”
and “A human being doesn’t have value simply in virtue of being a human…..”
and “I don’t believe in the existence of God, so it makes no sense to me to say that a human being is a creature of God. It’s as simple as that.”
 Last year appearing on “Up with Chris Hayes” Sanger said, “A person is a being with some awareness of who they are, existing beyond simply the physical organism.” When asked if that would exclude a four month old baby, her said “Possibly. I don’t think that’s problematic to say a four month old baby is not actually a person, that’s simply true.” Singer had advocated this position as far back as 1979.

No comments:

Post a Comment